Zazzle Shop

Screen printing
Showing posts with label EW. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EW. Show all posts

Friday, July 16, 2010

Ryan Reynolds Dons the Green Lantern Uniform!

Is that Hal Jordan or Slim Goodbody?


Green Lantern Ryan Reynolds
Credit: Entertainment Weekly

Vitals

UPDATE: Click the pic for a high-res version!

Today, the good people at EW give us the first glance Ryan Reynolds in the Green Lantern suit and I'm having a little trouble keeping the two sides of my brain from reenacting the Raan-Thanagar War.

Those who don't know anything about the Green Lantern mythos like to say that Hal Jordan (and the other members of the Corps) are lame superheroes simply because all they do is wear a ring.

We who know better say pshaw! Be it Kyle Rayner's artistic constructs, the multi-layered thinking of John Stewart, Guy Gardner's brute force, or Alan Scott's wisdom and nobility, a Lantern's might comes from within!

Still, though, the ring is important and with the ring comes the suit. The friggin' suit.

Ryan Reynolds looks sufficiently badass and quite stern as Hal Jordan. He's definitely not the Silver Age Hal Jordan "awww shucks"ing it with Carol Ferris and Pie-Face. He looks like he's ready to put a beatdown on anyone who messes with Sector 2814. And I think that is entirely cool.

The thing that everyone will first notice about the suit, though, is what looks like "musculature of light." That is definitely non-canonical - and while I did flash on Joel Schumacher's Batman nipples for a second, I'm thinking there's a lot that can be done with this.

Will we see Green Lantern power shooting through him? Will he glow when he's angry? (Taking a page out of Ion's book here a little, perhaps?)

Still, as a child of the 1980s, there was something about the suit that made it feel a little familiar.

Dear God, is Slim Goodbody a member of the GL Corps?

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Confused by the 'Lost' premiere? Never fear! Damon and Carlton explain a few things about the start of Season 6 (SPOILERS AHEAD)


Warning, SPOILERS ahead. If you haven’t seen the season premiere of Lost yet, you might not want to continue past the jump yet. Lost fans who have now seen the premiere can read ahead for some explanation from Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof. (Comments are likely to be full of spoilers also, you’ve been warned again.)

Once upon a time in Germany, a very smart and spiritual man tried to answer a very tricky and troubling question. In a world created by an allegedly benevolent and omnipotent God, why the heck is there suffering and evil? In the world of philosophy, this field of inquiry is called Theodicy, generally defined as an attempt to understand and justify the behavior of God. The genius German dude thought long and hard about this “problem of evil” question and came up with an answer that was unusually heady for the time. He said that despite the existence of evil, this world is actually “the best of all possible worlds,” as if our universe is the least offensive of countless alternatives, or even a pastiche comprised of pieces from the best parts of all. Wild.

Over the next 300 years, physicists, philosophers, and science fiction writers have blown out Gottfried Leibniz’s “possible worlds” concept in many different radical, challenging directions to serve all sorts of scientific and intellectual purposes, their various nuanced permutations producing a slough of different, seemingly synonymous yet not necessarily equal terms. Parallel worlds. Many worlds. Alternate realities. Mirror realities. Modal realities. Pocket universes. Bubble universes. And my favorite, “Island universes,” because it reminds me of a TV show I’m supposedly writing about, one that has referenced perhaps the foremost philosopher in this field, David Lewis.

Today, there are eggheads who believe that these “island universes” or whatnot are real — that they exist somewhere, as real and concrete as “our world,” inhabited by variations of ourselves. Naturally, this assertion has invited intense debate. Where are these worlds? Can we find them? If so, can we access them? Communicate with them? Visit them? Is there one “official world” and all the others of deviations? Did all these worlds pop into being at the same time, or do we continually create new worlds with every choice and non-choice? If so, do the other versions of you that exist across the multiverse of worlds create new worlds with their choices and non-choices, too? And who are these other “yous,” anyway? Are you separate, unique individuals? Do you share consciousness and/or a soul? Are you and your other yous destined to reach similar fates, played out through different events or circumstances? Are you and your other yous unique entities with unique destinies? Yes? No? Who knows? What does any of this Fringe-sounding s— have anything to do with Lost?!?!

Maybe everything. Maybe… nothing! Maybe something somewhere in the middle. What’s definitely for certain is this: If you’ve seen the season premiere of Lost (final SPOILER ALERT now!), you now know the hush-hush new storytelling device for the final season is this whole notion of parallel worlds. We were presented with two of them: one in which Oceanic 815 never crashed; and another that keeps continuity with the past five years of Lost having all the characters trapped in the Dharma Initiative past magically uploaded to the Island present of 2007 where the Jacob-Fake Locke-Ben drama is all going down. I’ll have a lot more to say on this tomorrow AM in my recap. But before then, I bring you news from two guys who you probably MOST want to hear from right now: Lost exec producers Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof. My “Totally Lost” partner Dan Snierson and I sat down with them to talk about the year’s”flash-sideways” storytelling device. Jokes Damon Lindelof: “You [had] all these fundamental mysteries going into season 6. What’s the Monster? What’s the Island? Why is Richard Alpert not able to age? But here’s this new mystery. How dare they! How dare they present us with a new mystery at this late stage in the game!”

Fortunately, here are the producers to offer some assurance of answers and provide some helpful context for season 6.

EW: The whole idea of flash-sideways and the plan to use season 6 to show us a world where Oceanic 815 never crashed — how long has that been in the works? Why did you want to do it?
DAMON LINDELOF: It’s been in play for at least a couple of years. We knew that the ending of the time travel season was going to be an attempt to reboot. And as a result, we [knew] the audience was going to come out of the “do-over moment” thinking we were either going start over or just say it didn’t work and continue on. [We thought] wouldn’t it be great if we did both? That was the origin of the story.
CARLTON CUSE: We thought just doing one [of those options] would inherently not be satisfying. Since the very beginning of the show, characters started crossing through each other’s stories. Part of our desire [in season 6] is to show that there’s still this kind of weave, that these characters still would have impacted each other’s lives even without the event of crashing on the Island. Obviously, the big question of the season is going to be: How do these [two timelines] reconcile? However, for the fans who have not watched the show closely, that’s an intact narrative. You can just watch the flash sideways — they stand alone all by themselves. For the fans who are more deeply embedded in the show, you can watch those flash sideways, compare them to what transpired in the flashbacks and go, “Oh, that’s an interesting difference.”
LINDELOF: Right out of the gate, in the first five minutes of the premiere, you get hit over the head with two things that you’re not expecting. The first is that Desmond is on the plane. The second thing that we do is we drop out of the plane and we go below the water and we see that the Island is submerged. What we’re trying to do there is basically say to you, “God bless the survivors of Oceanic 815, because they’re so self-centered, they thought the only effect [of detonating the bomb] was going to be that their plane never crashes.” But they don’t stop to think, “If we do this in 1977, what else is going to affected by this?” So that their entire lives can be changed radically. In fact, it would appear that they’ve sunken the Island. That’s our way of saying, “Keep your eyes peeled for the differences that you’re not expecting.” Some of these characters were still in Australia, but some weren’t. Shannon’s not there. Boone actually says that he tried to get her back. There are all sorts of other people that we don’t see. Where’s Libby? Where’s Ana Lucia? Where’s Eko? These are all the things that you’re supposed to be thinking about. When our characters posited the “What if?” scenario, they neglected to think about what the other effects of potentially changing time might be and we’re embracing those things.

That said, are you saying definitively that detonating Jughead was the event that created this new timeline? Or is that a mystery which the season 6 story will reveal?
LINDELOF: It’s a mystery. A big one.
CUSE: We did have some concern that it might be confusing kind of going into the season. To clear that up a little bit: The archetypes of the characters are the same and that’s the most significant thing. Kate is still a fugitive. If you were to look at the Comic-Con video, for instance, that now comes into play. There was a different scenario in that story. She basically blew up an apprentice plumber as opposed to killing her biological father/stepfather. Those kind of differences exist, but who the characters fundamentally are is the same. If it becomes too confusing for you, you can just follow the flash sideways for what they are. It’s not as though there’s narrative that hangs on the fact that you need to know that this event was different in that world, in the flashback world versus the sideways world. That’s not critical for being able to process the narrative this season.

Is there a relationship between Island reality and sideways reality? Will they run parallel for the remainder of the season? Will they fuse together? Might one fade away?
LINDELOF: For us, the big risk that we’re taking in the final season of the show is basically this very question. [Lindelof then explains the show has replaced the trademark “whoosh!” sound effect marking the segue between Island present story and flashbacks or flash-forwards, thus calling conspicuous attention to the relationship between the Island world and the Sideways world.] This is the critical mystery of the season, which is, “What is the relationship between these two shows?” And we don’t use the phrase “alternate reality,” because to call one of them an “alternate reality” is to infer that one of them isn’t real, or one of them is real and the other is the alternate to being real.
CUSE: But the questions you’re asking are exactly the right questions. What are we to make of the fact that they’re showing us two different timelines? Are they going to resolve? Are they going to connect? Are they going to co-exist in parallel fashion? Are they going to cross? Do they intersect? Does one prove to be viable and the other one not? I think those are all the kind of speculations that are the right speculations to be having at this point in the season.
LINDELOF: But it is going to require patience. We’ve taught the audience how to be patient thus far, so while they’re getting a lot of mythological answers on the island early in the season, this idea of what is the relationship between the two [worlds] is a little bit more of a slow burn.

Did Jughead really sink the Island? And is it possible that the Sideways characters are now caught in a time loop in which they might have to go back in time and fulfill the obligation to continuity by detonating the bomb?
LINDELOF: These questions will be dealt with on the show. Should you infer that the detonation of Jughead is what sunk the island? Who knows? But there’s the Foot. What do you get when you see that shot? It looks like New Otherton got built. These little clues [might help you] extrapolate when the Island may have sunk. Start to think about it. A couple of episodes down the road, some of the characters might even discuss it. We will say this: season 6 is not about time travel. It’s about the implications, the aftermath, and the causality of trying to change the past. But the idea of continuing to do paradoxical storytelling is not what we’re interested in this year.

There you go. Some food for thought. Dan and I will have more Messrs. Cuse and Lindelof later this week at EW.com and in the new issue of Entertainment Weekly, on sale Friday. If you’ve made it this far into this post, stay tuned: There’s a monstrously epic recap coming your way tomorrow. Until then, please: Get talking! What did you love? What did you hate? What left you totally baffled? What theories do you have to explain it all? The floor is yours!

Photo Credit: Mario Perez/ABC

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Exclusive! First Look at 12 Big Movies Coming In 2009

Compliments of EW

Public-Enemies_l

PUBLIC ENEMIES
In theaters July 1

You could say being an outlaw runs in Johnny Depp's blood. After all, his grandfather ran moonshine on the back roads of Kentucky during Prohibition. So it shouldn't come as any surprise that the actor jumped at the chance to play John Dillinger in Public Enemies. ''Dillinger was one of those guys, like Charlie Chaplin and Evel Knievel, that I was fascinated with at a young age,'' says Depp. ''And because of my grandfather, the character was pretty easy for me to connect to. In a way, this movie was a salute to him.''

Based on a book by Bryan Burrough, Enemies is a cat-and-mouse thriller about the early days of the FBI, and one agent's pursuit of the Depression-era bank robber whose dizzy reign of stickups and near escapes ended in a hail of bullets outside of Chicago's Biograph Theater in 1934. Dillinger lived fast, died young, and left not only a handsome corpse but a legacy as one of the most notorious criminals of the 20th century.

Public-Enemies-Bale_l

PUBLIC ENEMIES - Continued

Directed by Michael Mann (Heat, The Insider), and costarring Christian Bale as the dashing federal agent Melvin Purvis, Public Enemies might sound like a blood-soaked chapter of ancient history. But the film's themes couldn't be more timely: Dillinger was sticking up banks at a time when people weren't exactly rooting for the banks. As a result, he became something larger than life—a rock star with a tommy gun. ''Some people might disagree, but I think he was a real-life Robin Hood,'' says Depp, who just finished playing the Mad Hatter in Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland, due 2010. ''I mean, the guy wasn't completely altruistic, but he went out of his way not to kill anybody. He definitely gave a lot of that money away. I love the guy.''

Still hip-deep in the editing stage of the film, which he's readying for its July 2009 release, Mann remains in awe of his two leading men. ''Johnny has courage and immense power. It's all about the spontaneity of the moment for him. Christian works in a totally different way. He becomes the character so totally that he's that person 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The accent, everything.''

Public-Enemies-Depp_l

PUBLIC ENEMIES - Continued

Mann shot on the actual locations where Dillinger and Purvis made headlines, because, he says, ''when your hand touches the same doorknob Dillinger's did, it starts to talk to you.'' The director even managed to get his hands on a still-preserved suitcase left behind by Dillinger after one of his narrow getaways. ''All of the dress shirts were still folded perfectly,'' says Depp. ''It was a real insight into the guy. Because everything was ready to go at a moment's notice. It was just economical and beautiful.''

Depp even got to wear the pair of pants that Dillinger had on when he was finally caught and riddled with bullets. ''It was amazing,'' he says. ''And—get this—we're the same size!'' Like we said, the man was born to play the part.

terminator-john-connor_l

TERMINATOR SALVATION
In theaters May 22

Sci-fi nerds can be a tough crowd. But after this year's Comic-Con, where they got a peek at the Dark Knight himself, Christian Bale, playing a grown-up John Connor roaming a post–Judgment Day (and post-James Cameron) wasteland, the geek hordes crying Sacrilege! were appeased. What to look for: Stan Winston studio eye-candy F/X galore, and this ''old school'' T-600.

Terminator-Salvation_l

TERMINATOR - Continued

Will it work? All signs point to yes, since the producers have already signed on for two more Terminator installments. And having the hottest leading man in Hollywood right now doesn't hurt either. ''It was important for me to get the most credible actor of his generation to come and add gravitas to what we were trying to achieve,'' says director McG. ''I wanted to respect the audience, and be very mindful of the mythology. We take this very seriously.''

Watch the interview with the cast at Comic-Con

Ugly-Truth_l

THE UGLY TRUTH
In theaters April 3

Playing an uptight singleton with a list of boyfriend requirements made Katherine Heigl realize an ugly truth about herself: she once did the same thing. ''I was like, 'Oh my god, I had a checklist, too. This is so sad,''' she says. ''I didn't even realize that I was doing that.'' But the similarities stop there: In the film, directed by Robert Luketic (Legally Blonde), Heigl plays a morning-show producer who—thanks to a bet—finds herself following love advice from her chauvanistic co-worker (Gerard Butler). ''They embark on this ridiculous pairing of two people who are from polar opposite sides of the issue,'' Heigl says. ''The whole men are from Mars, women are from Venus thing.'' But Heigl cautions fans to not expect Truth to be as sugar-coated as her last rom-com, 27 Dresses. ''It's not so soft, and everything isn't so perfect,'' she says. ''This movie was just a little more edgy...enough to make it at least more interesting to the guys who take their girlfriends.''

Watch the trailer

Where-Wild-Things-1_l

WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE
In theatres Oct. 16

Australia. That's where the wild things are. Director Spike Jonze made extensive use of Down Under locales for his long-awaited take on Maurice Sendak's classic children's tale. ''The look and feel is very naturalistic—when our creatures knock down trees, they really knock down trees,'' says Jonze. ''When I was a boy, reading this story, I imagined myself really being there—not in front of a bluescreen.''

where-the-wild-things_l

WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE - Continued

Jonze has been in production since 2006 and admits ''none of it was easy.'' Among the challenges: evoking the rich interior life of a precocious child (newcomer Max Records, left). ''The movie rests on Max's performance,'' says Jonze. ''It's all about taking this 9-year-old seriously as a person.''

the-watchmen_l

WATCHMEN
In theaters March 6

In the acclaimed comic book's world, the slogan ''Who watches the Watchmen?'' becomes the rallying cry for a public fed up with vigilantes like the Comedian (Jeffrey Dean Morgan). But director Zack Snyder's adaptation coyly comments on another culture saturated with spandex. ''When we first posted our costume designs on the Internet, people went, 'The costumes have nipples! It's going to be like a Joel Schumacher Batman movie!' But that's exactly the point! Look, I saw those Batman movies. I know how they affected pop culture and what the kid next door who's never read a comic book thinks about them. It would be a mistake to think we missed that—we didn't.''

Watch the 4-part interview with the cast at Comic-Con

Taking-Pelham-Travolta_l

TAKING OF PELHAM 1-2-3
In theaters June 12

Denzel Washington and Tony Scott have conquered submarines (Crimson Tide) and ferryboats (Déjà Vu), so it was just a matter of time before the actor-director duo turned their attention to subway trains. Their remake of the 1974 classic pits Washington as an NYC transit worker against a hostage-taking John Travolta.

Taking-Pelham-Travolta_l

TAKING OF PELHAM 1-2-3
In theaters June 12

Denzel Washington and Tony Scott have conquered submarines (Crimson Tide) and ferryboats (Déjà Vu), so it was just a matter of time before the actor-director duo turned their attention to subway trains. Their remake of the 1974 classic pits Washington as an NYC transit worker against a hostage-taking John Travolta.

Taking-Pelham-Washington_l

TAKING OF PELHAM - Continued

Washington hadn't seen the original, but that didn't stop him from suggesting his character get demoted from cop to dispatch operator. ''He's not a guy familiar with weapons,'' explains Washington. ''So when he's put in the middle of this hostage situation, he's in over his head.''

half-blood-prince_l

HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE
In theaters July 17

Imagine making out with your sister. Now imagine something less taboo, and you'll know what it was like for Daniel Radcliffe to mack on Bonnie Wright, who plays Harry Potter's future wife Ginny Weasley in the sixth installment of the magical series. ''Harry's got a real thing for her, and that is slightly odd, because when we met, I was 11 and she was 9, and she was only ever Ron's little sister,'' says Radcliffe, now 19. ''But that all changed, and here we are snogging.''

Shooting Dumbledore's funeral was another tough scene for Radcliffe, as it took on the personality of an Irish wake thanks to some not-so-mournful extras: ''Because there's a lot of people there, it's one of those things that takes on a party atmosphere.''

jonas-bros-3d_l

JONAS BROTHERS: THE 3D CONCERT EXPERIENCE
In theaters Feb. 27

After helping pack multiplexes as the opening act in last year's 3-D Miley Cyrus concert film, the Brothers are inviting their adoring fans to strap on those special glasses all over again—this time for an all-Jonas feature. ''We had a great time being part of Miley's movie, but to be able to see what we liked in that movie and do more of it in our own movie was exciting,'' says oldest brother Kevin, 21. So what was on the Jonases' wish list? Tons of eye-popping arena footage from their summer '08 Burning Up Tour, plus a handful of scripted sequences and all-new performances. For one scene (pictured), they visited New York City's Central Park to play ''Love Is on Its Way,'' a tune that didn't make the cut for their platinum-selling A Little Bit Longer. ''It's been a dream of ours forever to film a music video in Central Park,'' says brother Nick, 16. ''And to see it in 3-D is amazing. We've always said we wish we could watch ourselves play, but obviously that's impossible!'' At least, it was until now.

Julie-and-Julia_l

JULIE & JULIA
In theaters Aug. 7

Ever the pro, Meryl Streep willed herself to grow eight inches to play 6'2'' superchef Julia Child. Just kidding! But the 5'6'' star did nail the part instantly when director Nora Ephron mentioned the project, a mix of the chef's memoirs and the true-life story of a bored secretary (Amy Adams) who spices up her life by tackling Child's recipes. ''Meryl turned into Julia Child and did two sentences in her voice,'' recalls Ephron. ''And I thought to myself, 'Well, look no further.'''

For the real thing, you can stream full episodes of Julia Child's instructional and highly entertaining cooking segments at PBS.org/juliachild.

Pixar-Up_l

UP
In theaters May 29

They've explored the depths of the sea, the edges of the earth, and the farthest reaches of outer space. So for their 10th feature film, Pixar's animation team had nowhere to go but...up. This flight of fancy tells the story of a curmudgeon (voiced by Ed Asner) who tries to escape his life by floating away in a house buoyed by balloons—only to find a chirpy 8-year-old stowaway onboard. Co-director Pete Docter says the team considered a deserted island for the pair's destination before settling on Venezuela's tabletop mountains (which inspired Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's The Lost World). So, for research purposes, Docter and 11 Pixar artists journeyed to the site in 2004. ''We hiked up to the top of the mountain and stayed there for three nights, painting and sketching. It was great,'' says Docter. Best of all? ''Everybody made it out alive.''

Obsessed_l

OBSESSED
In theaters April 24

A Los Angeles businessman (The Wire's Idris Elba) has a beautiful wife (Beyoncé Knowles) who used to be his beautiful assistant. But when said businessman gets another beautiful assistant (played by Heroes' Ali Larter), things get complicated, once she makes it clear she'd like the wife's position, too. ''We did look at girl fights on YouTube,'' says director Steve Shill, hinting at the turn the story takes. ''There's a lot of hair pulling, shouting, and rolling around on the ground. We didn't really want to do that.'' Still, we know this much: You do not want to come between Sasha Fierce and her man.

the-year-one_l

YEAR ONE
In theaters June 19

Comedy legend Harold Ramis (Caddyshack, Groundhog Day) first started noodling with the idea of setting a comedy in the ancient world back in, well, pretty much the Stone Age. ''I did an improv a long time ago with Bill Murray and John Belushi, where Bill was a Cro-Magnon man and Belushi was a Neanderthal,'' Ramis says. ''Putting a modern sensibility in an ancient context always seemed very funny to me.'' Flash forward approximately one eon and the Judd Apatow-produced Year One pairs Jack Black and Michael Cera as Zed and Oh, hunter-gatherers who are banished from their village and wander through scenes from the Old Testament, encountering the likes of Cain and Abel (David Cross and Paul Rudd) and Abraham (Hank Azaria). Asked if he expects the film's religious satire to offend, Ramis laughs: ''I hope so!''

land-of-the-lost_l

LAND OF THE LOST
In theaters June 5

Take a beloved '70s Saturday morning kids' show about a family trapped in an alternate universe populated by dinosaurs, reptilian Sleestaks, and caveman-like Pakuni, stir in Will Ferrell, ditch the cheesy effects, and the Gen-Xer mind reels at the possibilities for a summer blockbuster. ''We thought it was better served if it errs more on the side of Jurassic Park in terms of realism, and the dinosaurs are just scary as s---, and the comedy plays off of that,'' Ferrell says. ''You're not going to see the zipper up the back of the Sleestaks' costumes.''

Wolverine_l

X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE
In theatres May 1

The claw-pawed man-mutant cuts in front of his fellow X-Men with his own creation story, which traces how Logan's macho rivalry with Sabretooth (Liev Schreiber) and his thwarted love affair with Silver Fox (Lynn Collins) set the stage for his tranformation into Wolverine. So why did Hugh Jackman's character get the first Origins nod? ''It wasn't always part of the plan, but Hugh brought that character to vivid life,'' says producer Lauren Shuler Donner, recalling the endurance test he faced filming this water-tank scene where his character is injected with a substance that makes him impenetrable. ''We tortured the man. he is an animal. A normal person could not do that.''

Watch the interview with Hugh Jackman at Comic-Con


Angels-Demons-Hanks_l

ANGELS & DEMONS
In theaters May 15

Don't worry: No clergy were harmed in the filming of this scene from the sequel to 2006's The Da Vinci Code. And yes, we said ''sequel.'' While Dan Brown wrote the novel Angels & Demons before The Da Vinci Code, the filmmakers decided not to go the prequel route onscreen, to keep continuity in the character of Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks, right, with newcomer Ayelet Zurer).


Angels-Demons_l

Like Da Vinci, Angels is already irking the Catholic Church—which made filming around the Vatican tricky. ''On [shoot] day, the police would say, 'This location is no longer available to you,''' recalls producer Brian Grazer. ''Rome is very small. When you're shooting a big movie, you can't be covert.''

Watch the trailer

Written by Leah Greenblatt, Jeff Jensen, Adam Markovitz, Chris Nashawaty, Josh Rottenberg, Nicole Sperling, Christine Spines, Adam B. Vary, Simon Vozick-Levinson, Kate Ward