2008 Olympics Opening Ceremony [PICS]
























more here:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-080808-olympics-opening-photogallery,0,2843741.photogallery
Adding Value To The World, one Post At A Time
Posted by gjblass at 12:21 PM 0 comments
And here are the lyrics to one of his other songs...
Two tablespoon's of cinnamon,
and two or three egg whites.
A half a stick of butter?. Melted?
stick it all in a bowl baby.
Stir it with a wooden spoon.
Mix in a cup of flour,
you'll be in heaven soon.
Say everybody have you seen my balls
they're big and salty and brown.
If you ever need a quick pick me up
just stick my balls in your mouth.
Oooo suck on my chocolate salted balls
stick em in your mouth, and suck em!
Suck on my chocolate salted balls,
they're packed full of vitamins, and good for you.
So suck on my balls.
Quarter cup of unsweeten chocolate,
and a half a cup of brandy.
You throw in a bag or two of sugar
and just a pinch of vanilla.
Grease up the cookie sheet.
Cause I hate when my balls stick.
Then preheat the oven to three fifty
and give that spoon a lick?
Say everybody have you seen my balls
they're big and salty and brown.
If you ever need a quick pick me up
just stick my balls in your mouth.
Suck on my chocolate salted balls.
Put em in your mouth, and suck em!
Suck on my chocolate salted balls,
there packed full of goodness, high on fiber.
Suck on my balls.
[sniff, sniff, sniff]
Hey, wait a minute.
What's that smell.
Smell like something burning.
Well that don't confront me none.
Long as I get my rent paid on Friday.
Baby you better get back in the kitchen.
Cause I got a sneak'n suspicion.
Oh man baby, baby!
You just burned my balls!
Help me, my balls on fire
????? baby
my balls are burning
give me some water!
Pour some water on me!
my balls are burning
oh my goodness,
I'm blow'n
I'm blow'n
do somethin
Oooo Suck on my chocolate salted balls.
Put em in your mouth, and suck em!
They'r on fire baby!
Suck on my chocolate salted balls,
put em out baby, blow
ohh
Suck on my balls baby
Suck on my balls baby
Suck on my, red hot, salted, chocolate balls
come on baby
woo, woo
suck on my balls.
[blow blow]
Posted by MacDaddy at 11:54 AM 0 comments
![]() The Americans, led by Michael Phelps (left), shattered the world record set by their "B" team on Sunday in the prelims. AP |
BEIJING (AP) -- With history about to slip away and Michael Phelps cheering him on, Jason Lezak pulled up next to the lane rope and set out after hulking Alain Bernard, like a NASCAR driver drafting down the backstretch at Daytona.
Only 25 meters to go, half the length of the pool. Every stroke brought Lezak a little closer, a little closer, a little closer, his body seemingly carried along by the Frenchman's massive wake. The two lunged for the wall together. When the result flashed on the board, Phelps was still on course for his record eight gold medals.
By a fingertip.
Lezak, the oldest man on the U.S. swimming team, pulled off one of the great comebacks in Olympic history Monday morning, hitting the wall just ahead of Bernard in the 400 freestyle relay, a race so fast it actually erased two world records.
Few sporting events live up to the hype -- this one exceeded it. The 32-year-old Lezak was nearly a body length behind Bernard as they made the final turn, but the American hugged the lane rope and stunningly overtook him on the very last stroke.
Wow!
"This has been happening my whole career," Lezak said. "People have gotten on my lane line and sucked off of me, so I figured this is the one opportunity in my whole career to do that."
Watching on deck, Phelps let out a resounding "Yeaaaaaah!" and thrust both arms toward the roof of the Water Cube. His quest to break Mark Spitz's record of seven gold medals had survived what will likely be its toughest test -- and almost certainly its most thrilling.
The Americans shattered the world record set by their "B" team the previous evening in the preliminaries, touching with a time of 3 minute, 8.24 seconds -- nearly 4 full seconds below the 15-hour-old mark of 3:12.23.
"Unbelievable," said Phelps, who swam the leadoff leg and then became the team's biggest cheerleader. "Jason finished that race better than we could even ask for. I was fired up. Going into that last 50, I was like, `Aw, this is going to be a close race.' Jason's last 10 or 15 meters were incredible."
The Americans won the relay at seven straight Olympics, but watched the Australians and South Africans take gold at the last two games.
"You could tell I was pretty excited," Phelps said. "I lost my voice and I was definitely pretty emotional out there."
Bernard was the world record holder in the 100, but he surrendered that mark as well. Australia's Eamon Sullivan broke the individual record by swimming the leadoff leg in 47.24 -- ahead of Bernard's mark of 47.50.
Oh, by the way, Phelps set an American record leading off, 47.51. But it was Lezak's anchor that everyone will remember. He got down and back in a staggering 46.06, the fastest relay leg in history though it doesn't count as an official record.
"A fingertip did the victory," said Amaury Leveaux, one of the French swimmers. "It is nothing."
Lezak looked at the scoreboard, then leaped out of the water with an emphatic fist pump.
"I knew I was going to have to swim out of my mind," Lezak said. "Still right now, I'm in disbelief."
Garrett Weber-Gale and Cullen Jones also did their parts on the middle legs of the relay, overcoming the enormous pressure of making sure they didn't mess up Phelps' attempt to take down the Holy Grail of Olympic records. Jones was the only holdover from the team that swam in the prelims.
Lezak should get a share of that $1 million bonus that Phelps has been promised if he goes on to beat Spitz's mark.
"I never lost hope," said Lezak, who trains alone but has been a longtime stalwart on the relay team. "I don't know how I was able to take it back that fast, because I've never been able to come anywhere near that for the last 50."
While the Americans whooped it up on deck, Bernard clung to the wall, his head down. The swimmer who had talked confidently of beating the Americans -- "smashing" them, some media reported -- was the last one to leave the pool.
"Alain is wounded. When you are the last swimmer in a relay and that you have the opportunity to bring a title of this importance to your country, you don't get out of this unhurt," said Claude Fauquet, France's team director. "But I don't think that Alain lost the race. It's Lezak who won it."
The French were second in 3:08.32 -- eight one-hundredths of a second behind. Australia took the bronze in 3:09.91. In fact, the top five all went below the record set Sunday.
"I felt I was in the lead," Bernard said. "I knew I had to accelerate, but it got harder."
The Americans also were on the losing end of a last-lap comeback.
Katie Hoff was again denied a gold medal when Rebecca Adlington of Britain rallied over the final 50 meters to overtake the 19-year-old, who had settled for a bronze the previous day in the 400 individual medley.
Adlington won in 4:03.22, while Hoff took the silver in 4:03.29. Adlington's teammate Joanne Jackson earned the bronze in 4:03.52. Defending champion Laure Manaudou finished last in the eight-woman final.
"I saw Katie and thought, 'Let's just try to catch her,"' Adlington said. "That's what I did."
Hoff still has three more individual events, plus a relay.
"I was a little disappointed I was so close," she said. "But I got a bronze yesterday and a silver this morning. If I keep climbing at this pace, I'll be happy."
President Bush was back at the Water Cube for the second day in a row, with wife Laura on one side, daughter Barbara on the other. Former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and his wife were sitting in front of them, and Bill Gates was right behind.
Clearly, the swimming record book will need some heavy revisions by the time the Beijing Olympics are over.
Two more world marks fell Monday morning when Kosuke Kitajima of Japan finished off American Brendan Hansen's hopes of an individual medal, winning the 100 breaststroke in 58.91. Kitajima pounded the water defiantly and let out a scream after breaking Hansen's 2-year-old record of 59.13.
Hansen was left without a medal, fading to fourth behind silver medalist Alexander Dale Oen of Norway and Hugues Duboscq of France, who took bronze.
Kirsty Coventry didn't even bother waiting until a final to set a record in the 100 backstroke. The Zimbabwean won her semifinal heat in 58.77, taking down Natalie Coughlin's mark of 58.97 set at the U.S. trials last month.
They'll go head to head in Tuesday morning's final. Coughlin won her heat in 59.43 with a nice, comfortable swim.
Seven world records have been set through the first 21/2 days at the Water Cube.
Phelps had another race to care of, moving on to the final of the 200 free with the fourth-fastest time of the semis. Trying to save as much energy as possible for the leadoff leg of the relay, the American touched in 1:46.28 to finish behind teammate Peter Vanderkaay (1:45.76) and South Korea's Park Tae-hwan (1:45.99).
Jean Basson of South Africa also went faster in the other heat, winning in 1:46.13.
While Hansen still has a swim left in the medley relay, he'll go down as one of the major disappointments of the American team. A one-time world record holder in both the 100 and 200 breaststrokes, he didn't even qualify for the Olympics in the longer race.
Putting all his hopes of beating Kitajima in the 100, he wasn't close to the Japanese star, finishing 0.66 seconds behind.
"I've just had a really off year, on a really important year," Hansen said. "I just feel like that's not the last you're going to see of me. I'm going to bring it back and I won't be done until I at least have a legitimate shot at those world records again."
Hansen swam over to Kitajima's lane to congratulate the winner.
"That's a hell of a swim, and he is a true champion," he said.
Coventry put down quite a challenge to Coughlin. Then again, Coughlin has been known to rise to the challenge -- when Hayley McGregory broke her world record in the prelims at the U.S. trials, Coughlin came back in the very next heat to take it back.
Now, Coventry has it, and Coughlin can't be too happy about that.
"It's going to be a tight final," Coventry said. "Natalie's just so good at racing and planning out her races, so I just expect nothing but fast, fast swimming tomorrow morning."
Coughlin will be side-by-side with Coventry in the final.
"It went very well," she said. "It's exactly where I wanted to be going into the finals. I'm happy with that. I just need to recover and focus on my final."
Libby Trickett of Australia just missed another world record in the women's 100 butterfly, winning gold with a time of 56.73. American Christine Magnuson claimed the silver (57.10) and another Aussie, Jess Schipper, took the bronze (57.25).
Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Posted by gjblass at 11:53 AM 0 comments
Full nuclear sequence, offering clues about our relatives' demise, expected within months.
James Morgan
The first complete genome of a Neanderthal — specifically, the mitochondrial DNA found in a 38,000-year-old bone — has been sequenced.
The highly accurate sequence contains clues that our relatives lived in small, isolated populations, and probably did not interbreed with their human neighbours. “This is the first ‘finished’ genome sequence of an extinct human relative,” says the study’s lead scientist, Ed Green, of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.
Analysis of the DNA, taken from a bone fragment from the Vindija Cave in Croatia, puts the date of our last common ancestor at around 660,000 years ago, give or take 140,000 years. This is broadly in line with other estimates based on archaeology.
The research, published in Cell1, is a taster for the unveiling later this year of the complete Neanderthal nuclear genome sequence — which many hope will reveal the key genetic changes that propelled the evolution of human behaviour.
Neanderthals lived across Europe and western Asia from a few hundred thousand years ago to around 30,000 years ago. Although a great deal is known about their physiology and social practices from archaeological and fossil evidence, the reason for their demise remains a mystery.
To date, there have been more than a dozen sequences of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA published. “But for the first time, we've built a sequence from ancient DNA that is essentially without error,” says Green.
“Contamination has been a constant dark cloud hanging over the field of ancient DNA sequencing. It has tainted our work,” he says. “People have been too busy evaluating the accuracy of the Neanderthal sequences to really think about what these sequences actually mean if they are real.”
Two years ago, Green’s colleague Svante Pääbo began his project to map the entire Neanderthal genome, setting out to probe more than 60 museum specimens for traces of DNA. In an effort to eliminate contamination, the team have been generating DNA libraries in the same clean room where they do the DNA fossil extraction.
The scientists sequenced the Neanderthal mitochondrial genome 35 times, giving them enough data to compare it with the human genome and reliably identify which differences were caused by evolution, and which by sample degradation. The result is a genome sequence which was hailed as “extremely rigorous”, by Edwin Rubin, director of the Joint Genome Institute in Walnut Creek, California.
“The near complete absence of human contamination is enormously encouraging and bodes well for the Neanderthal nuclear genome sequences that have been generated from this sample,” says Rubin.
The team found that of the 13 proteins encoded in the Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA, one in particular had experienced a significant number of amino acid changes in humans, since our separation from Neanderthals.
However, these changes did not have a significant effect on the functional domain of subunit 2 of cytochrome c oxidase (COX2), part of the mitochondrial electron transport chain.
Some scientists hope that genetic clues about why human rose to prominence and Neanderthals died out will be revealed in a few months, with the unveiling of the complete nuclear genome sequence. “We are on course to publish a complete one-fold coverage by later this year,” says Green.
But others are not convinced. “Whatever it was that sparked the emergence of human behaviour 30,000–40,000 years ago, I’m convinced it was not genetic,” says Erik Trinkaus a palaeontologist at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri.
“The genome sequence data may tell us something about the selection of a couple of proteins, but it tells us nothing about language or social behaviour,” says Trinkaus.
Posted by gjblass at 11:50 AM 0 comments
A Dutch University will see if chemically tricked-out paving stones can clean the air.
The University of Twente (UT) has devised a concrete capable of converting the nitrogen oxide from car exhaust--the source of smog and acid rain--into a nitrate, another chemical that will wash away in the rain.
Green chemistry: how green bricks convert nitrogen oxide air pollution into nitrates with the sun.
(Credit: University of Twente)The researchers came up with the air-purifying paving stones by tapping the properties of titanium dioxide, a chemical that catalyzes chemical reactions when exposed to light.
The top layer of the University of Twente paving stones contains the material mixed with concrete. So when sun shines, smog-producing pollutants will convert into nitrates and then wash away, keeping the stones surface clean in the process.
The university received a sustainability grant to test its invention in the municipality of Hengelo.
By the end of this year, researchers expect to complete construction of a road where one side is built with the specially coated paving stones. The other half will have tradition materials.
The results of how much the stones reduce air pollution should be ready by next year. If successful, the tests could be expanded further, the university said.
It's not the first time that the Dutch have been inventive with road construction. A civil engineering firm has devised a paving technique to absorb heat from asphalt to melt ice and heat neighboring buildings.
Posted by gjblass at 11:48 AM 0 comments
Nazi propaganda complete color film from 1936. An outstanding portrait of everyday life in Berlin in this rare, well preserved film, with the magical feeling of the pastel colors of Agfachrome.
read more | digg story
Posted by gjblass at 11:48 AM 0 comments
Centuries-old shards of pottery mingle with spent ammunition rounds
Posted by gjblass at 11:31 AM 0 comments
By Neil Squillante | Monday, August 20, 2007
TechnoScore: 4.7 out of 5
Lawyers love their BlackBerrys and to a lesser extent their Treos. But lawyers also love their iPods. The iPhone combines BlackBerry-like communications with an iPod plus other features not found on either.
Should you choose an iPhone for your next or first smartphone? Find out below in my review.
Don't Waste Your Time Reading This Review ...
If your law firm has already invested in the BlackBerry platform — and by this I mean BlackBerry Enterprise Server, not the devices themselves — you may not want to waste your time reading this review as no amount of begging and pleading will likely persuade the powers that be to switch to the iPhone or even support it. (Of course, you could buy an iPhone on your own dime, and synchronize it with your office computer on the sly — or with your home computer.)
RIM realized a long time ago that the secret to a law firm's heart lies in its Microsoft Exchange server. Theoretically, the iPhone is Exchange-compatible out of the box, but only if you configure your Exchange server to support IMAP, an email protocol. Even if you do that, the BlackBerry has the iPhone beat in one key area — "push" versus "pull" synchronization of your contacts, calendar, and most importantly, email.
For some, push versus pull is a distinction without a difference, but others consider it critically important so let me explain what it means.
Push works like a phone call — the BlackBerry alerts you as soon as email arrives on your firm's Exchange server. Plus the BlackBerry wirelessly synchronizes your calendar and contacts, again from your Exchange server.
Pull requires that you manually check your email or have your iPhone check it every few minutes. Also, synchronizing your calendar and contacts requires tethering your iPhone to your computer with a cable. If you use IMAP email, however, the email on your iPhone will exactly match the email on your computer, including sent mail, drafts, trash, and all other folders — instantaneously and wirelessly.
If you walk into a store and buy a BlackBerry, it will work like an iPhone (though you can sync via BlueTooth in addition to USB). Only BlackBerrys that connect via BlackBerry Enterprise Server have the push synchronization abilities noted above.
I have never used a BlackBerry or Treo so my iPhone is my first smartphone. If you switched from BlackBerry or Treo to iPhone, please supplement my review with your own.
Is That an iPhone in Your Pocket ...
Regarding physical form factor, the iPhone stands alone. It's the thinnest smartphone available. In fact, it's even thinner the the Razr, which is not even a smartphone. It's also thinner than the iPod.
Thinness enhances mobility. Apple understands this principle better than any other company. In fact, industrial design seems like an afterthought at many companies.
Look Ma, No Scratches ...
Unlike the iPod, the iPhone does not easily scratch thanks to its use of glass for the screen and metal for the body. You won't need to invest in a case, which in my opinion, would defeat the thinness factor.
Reach Out and Touch Me ...
The iPhone's touchscreen in conjunction with its interface sets it apart in an industry dominated by styli and thumbwheels. The iPhone contains only one button on its face, which takes you to the home screen. From there, you just press the application you want to use. You can run multiple applications simultaneously.
As a hunt and peck typist who uses 3 fingers, I can report that the much-debated (often by people who haven't used it) on-screen keyboard is a nonissue. Actually, it's a plus because it has virtually no learning curve. Most people start with their index finger and eventually graduate to their thumbs. I use both methods depending on the application.
For example, I use my thumbs when writing email, but my index finger when entering URLs, passwords, etc. in the Web browser. The latter is slower but more precise. The keyboard's "predictive text" technology has an uncanny ability to correct mistakes. As many others have said, just type and let the software worry about what you enter. Of course, this technology is useless for passwords or URLs (unless the URL is in your bookmarks), which explains why I use the more precise text entry method for these items.
I tested my typing speed using the iPhone Typing Test and scored 23 words per minute. That compares to a score of 35 wpm using a standard keyboard. I rarely type 35 wpm in real life because I don't use outlines. Instead, I write, think a little, write some more, etc.
The Big Four ...
Apple placed the four most prominent applications across the bottom of the iPhone — Phone, Mail, Safari, and iPod.
Phone
The phone is far superior to any mobile phone I've ever used. Thanks to "visual voicemail," you can randomly access voicemail messages like email, and even retrieve them after deletion.
The Phone's best feature, though is Favorites — people you frequently call. Thanks to an intuitive interface, adding people to this list from your address book requires no training.
When you place a call, an on-screen menu enables you to use the speaker, put the person on hold, conference in a third person, or mute your end of the call. The speakerphone volume varies between being just perfect or a little too low depending on whom you call. I have yet to use a BlueTooth headset, but plan to buy one soon—probably the BlueAnt Z9.
Email is a dream come true for this email addict. After many painstaking hours, I converted years of email from POP to IMAP. With IMAP, you store your email on a server, which means it's identical wherever you access it — Outlook, Webmail, BlackBerry, iPhone, etc. By contrast, POP stores your messages on your hard drive.
Traditionally, POP held a key advantage — the size of your mailbox is relatively unimportant because you download your new mail onto your hard drive. But the tide has turned thanks to Gmail, which began a revolution in mailbox size. Ironically, Gmail does not support IMAP, but thanks to its influence our email provider (Webmail.us) offers 1 GB mailboxes standard. We upgraded to 2 GB for a nominal fee. (In the next issue of TechnoGuide, I'll provide step-by-step instructions on how to switch from POP to IMAP.)
The iPhone's Mail application is robust. For example, it displays the HTML version of our newsletters perfectly. In fact, it's better than a desktop application in that you can set it to always download graphics rather than have to do it email by email. It lacks two features I regularly use — Resend and BCC. I suspect Apple will add BCC in a software update. I don't know about Resend.
Regarding attachments, you can read Word and PDF files, and view images such as photos. You can also forward attachments you receive, and email your own photos.
Safari
The Safari Web browser on iPhone is just like Safari on Mac (and now Windows) with two significant exceptions — it does not yet support Flash and it's unstable.
Flash is a nonissue since it will likely arrive via software update someday plus the iPhone comes with a YouTube application that actually works better than YouTube on the Web.
But the stability problems are a sore point. Some people seem to have better luck than others, which may stem from the Web sites you visit or whether your iPhone is a "5" or a "7". I have a "7" and inevitably experience a crash every session. One crash that everyone seems to experience occurs when you play the iPod and then try to surf. Fortunately, turning off the iPhone and rebooting seems to help. I'm confident that Apple will improve stability with a software update.
When it works, though, Safari is just as thrilling as Mail. For example, I checked an eBay auction while standing on the boardwalk on Coney Island two days ago. I don't have a dedicated computer at home because I like having everything in one laptop. Lately, I've left my laptop at work because the iPhone has everything I need at home — email, Web, and media — plus phone of course.
iPod
The iPod lacks a few features, but it's still "the best iPod ever" to quote Apple CEO Steve Jobs. Because of the touchscreen interface, you can more easily create On-the-Go playlists, rate songs, and scroll though a long list. Using these familiar functions with a different interface makes you realize the importance of user interface design.
If you use an iPod, you'll feel constrained by the 4 or 8 GB of memory (I have the 8 GB version), but if you use an iPod nano or an iPod shuffle you won't miss a beat.
The iPhone should work with your iPod accessories. It works with my iPod HiFi at home and my Kensington FM transmitter in my car. Other people have encountered problems.
The killer feature on the iPhone's iPod is its video implementation Large and razor sharp, the screen makes for compelling viewing. I should note that album art, photos, and text also look great on the screen.
The Other Apps ...
Regarding the other bundled applications:
SMS makes this form of communication simple to use, but it doesn't make up for the lack of a chat client. For the time being, I use Meebo's new Web-based iPhone chat client. Other options include BeeJive and FlickIM.
Calendar is extremely well-implemented. The List view gives you a quick run-down of your upcoming events.
Photos takes full advantage of the touchscreen interface. If you work with photos in your cases, it's an excellent way to review them without the need for a laptop.
Camera takes surprisingly good photos. I shot some nice aerials on the Wonder Wheel at Coney Island despite rocking back and forth. I've placed two of these photos below.
YouTube, as I noted above, works better on the iPhone than on the Web. The videos look better as well thanks to the superior QuickTime H.264 encoding.
Stocks works well. Those who use a Mac will find it familiar.
Weather also works like its Mac counterpart. It's more useful than you might think because it shows you what's happening right now (e.g., rain), which is great if you're in a window-less conference room.
Maps, like YouTube, provides a superior experience on the iPhone than on the Web. I've never gone to Coney Island. Hence, my last-minute trip before it closes for renovation. In the past, I would have printed directions from Google Maps. Instead, my friend simply read from the iPhone's screen while I drove (we still took one wrong turn, but that resulted from poor signage, not the iPhone).
Clock might not excite most people, but I'm a heavy user of my iPod's Alarm and Stopwatch. For example, we used the stopwatch to test printing speeds for the eBook we recently published, BlawgWorld 2007 with TechnoLawyer Problem/Solution Guide (PDF file). The iPhone's Stopwatch is better than the one on the iPod, but the Alarm is inferior because you cannot choose an iPod playlist, only a ringtone. I hope Apple adds this capability in a future update.
Calculator is what you would expect.
Notes is useful for jotting down a number that you don't want to enter into your address book. While the iPhone doesn't (yet) synchronize to your notes in Entourage or Outlook, you can email them to yourself or others—or even to Google Docs.
Legal Apps ...
No legal applications currently exist for the iPhone because Apple does not currently permit third-party software programs. Thus, you cannot directly synchronize your case management software with the iPhone.
But, the iPhone has a computer-grade Web browser. Therefore, Web-based legal software will work on the iPhone just as it does on your computer as long as it doesn't rely on Java or Flash.
In an article entitled, Legal Startup Has its Eye on the iPhone Bandwagon, the Houston Chronicle recently covered Advologix, an iPhone-compatible Web application that handles case management, time-billing, online marketing, and more.
We ourselves use a Web-based application called PeerViews Mail to operate TechnoLawyer. It works well on the iPhone except for one feature that requires Java. In fact, I plan to publish this newsletter using my iPhone.
Other Noteworthy Items ...
Activation
As an existing AT&T customer, I had no activation problems. It took less than 5 minutes in the comfort of my office. I plan to switch one of my landline numbers to the iPhone, but have not started the process yet.
Synchronization
If you've used an iPod, you will not have to learn anything new. Just fire up iTunes.
Earphones
I've always preferred in-ear sound-isolating earphones so instead using the earbuds that Apple includes I bought a pair of Shure's new SE210 earphones and accompanying Music Phone Adapter. With this combination, you can answer your phone and silence the iPod with a button on the cable. The cable also has a microphone. The new SE series has a modular design that enables you to integrate devices like the Music Phone Adapter without excess wire. Shure is way out in front of its competitors in this new product category.
Battery
The lack of a user-replaceable battery doesn't bother me. Like my iPod, I suspect my iPhone's battery will die long after I've upgraded to the next version of the iPhone. So far, the battery has taken me through en entire day and then some, including heavy iPod use and Web surfing.
Connectivity
The iPhone connects to the Internet using WiFi if available or AT&T's Edge network. WiFi works well, but don't expect it to rival your computer in terms of speed. AT&T's Edge network leaves much to be desired in New York. Your mileage may vary. I plan to swing by the Apple store to see how mine stacks up against a display model for an apples to apples comparison (ha) to make sure my iPhone does not have a defect. You can try these speed tests:
My iVerdict ...
I overheard a lawyer discussing how he wanted an iPhone, but planned to wait for the next version. Life is short. If a smartphone would make you more productive now, buy one now.
If you place a high value on industrial design, user interface, tightly-integrated software, a real Web browser, and an integrated iPod, look no further than the iPhone. If you use a Mac, ditto.
If you place a high value on price, 3G data speeds, and third-party applications, consider the BlackBerry or Treo instead.
The one comparison I cannot provide concerns email. I like how the iPhone handles email, but don't know how it stacks up against the BlackBerry or Treo. However, please look below for some photos of the iPhone's Mail application in action from the perspective of a heavy email user.
Finally, and most importantly, if you buy an iPhone, BlackBerry Curve, Treo 750, or some other smartphone, please post your own review.
I used to say that once you use a laptop, there's no going back to a desktop. Similarly, once you use a smartphone, there's no going back to a cell phone.
Other Noteworthy iPhone Reviews
Finis Price, iPhone Review for Attorneys, TechnoEsq
Anonymous, My iPhone Experience, Briefly, Practical Lawyering
Ernest Svenson, iHeaven, Ernie the Attorney
iPhone in Action: Mail
iPhone in Action: Camera
A TechnoEditorial is the vehicle through which we opine and provide tips of interest to managing partners, law firm administrators, and others in the legal profession. TechnoEditorials appear first in TechnoGuide, and later here in TechnoLawyer Blog. TechnoGuide, which is free, also contains exclusive content. You can subscribe here.
Posted by gjblass at 11:16 AM 0 comments
![]() | 10. Amanda Beard Despite the unappealingly masculine name, Ms Beard is in fact an American Olympic swimmer and model. She’s not shy, either: in her time she’s appeared in Sports Illustrated, Playboy and good ol’ FHM. Which is nice. |
![]() | 9. Gretchen BleilerYou might not guess it to look at her, but young Gretchen is the big name in female snowboarding. When she’s not tearing up half-pipes, she likes looking pretty, playing with her hair, and mini-golf. At a guess, anyway. |
![]() | 8. Amy Taylor The archetypal image of a female footballer may leave you quivering under your Subbuteo-print bedsheets, but this one’s different: she’s pretty. She’s Australian. She could kick your arse at five-a-side – she’s the perfect woman. |
![]() | 7. Biba Golic Table tennis is cool. That’s a fact. We know this because any sport that brings us a woman as hot as Biba has to be cool. Has to be. |
![]() | 6. Maria SharapovaMaria, Maria, Maria. Classier than Kournikova, prettier than Nadal, but still no match for Ivanovic in the hotness stakes. So near, and yet, so far. |
![]() | 5. Natalie GulbisIn such a refined and regal sport as golf, it may seem a touch vulgar to ask, but still – how does she swing the club so well with such ample breasts? It’s quite the conundrum… |
![]() | 4. Allison StokkeAt the age of just 17, Allison was pole-vaulted (boom boom) to stardom by being, well… hot. Swiftly becoming an internet phenomenon, she’s brought a new found respect to the stick-waggling profession. And by ‘respect’ we mean ‘lust’. |
![]() | 3. Nikki GudexHer name may make her sound like some kind of robotic seductress, but in reality she’s a world-class mountain biker. Her legs look long and sleek, but underneath lie pistons of steel. Our guess is she could probably beat the crap out of you too. Yes, we can tell. |
![]() | 2. Bia and Branca FeresThere are two of them! And they’re both stunning! And they do synchronised swimming! That means bikinis – yes it does. |
![]() | 1. Ana IvanovicWe’ve loved this racket-wielding siren for quite some time now. She’s just so damn beautiful – which is why we’ve m |
Posted by gjblass at 11:13 AM 0 comments
The Beijing National Stadium, nicknamed “The Bird's Nest,” has already become an icon in the country of 1.3 billion. But for some farmers close to Hangzhou (located in the southeast of China), the Herzog & de Meuron structure was just too darn far away... so in a fit of DIY ingenuity, they built their own replica out of bamboo. Steel's apparently kind of hard to get when you're living on a couple of dollars a day.
Altogether, it took ten bamboo sculptors roughly two weeks to put together the Bird's Nest (at a 1:20 scale of the Beijing original) out of 800 pieces of bamboo. The villagers say they plan to use the structure for local sports events. Hmmm... As cool as this DIY structure is, I'm not sure what kind of sport you'd be able to fit in it. Ping pong? [Shufa via Weird Asia News]
And just for comparison, the Beijing Stadium:
Posted by gjblass at 11:11 AM 0 comments
Will Lightning Strike in the UK?
A native car company unveils a 700-horsepower electric supercar at the British Motor Show 2008 — but will it really work?
By Christopher Hubbard of MSN autos
Click to see more pictures The Lightning is all classic GT, with a long hood, low curving roofline, and massive multi-spoke alloy wheels.
Well here's a shock: a good looking British sports car (sorry Lotus). This is the Lightning GT, and instead of guzzling super unleaded it creates 700 horsepower using batteries.
Or so the Lightning Car Company claims. But we'll leave off being cynical for a moment (don't worry, it is only for a moment) and continue telling you just how good this thing looks. It is all classic GT: long hood, low curving roofline, and massive multi-spoke alloy wheels, complete with a major surprise.
View Pictures: Lightning GT
Those blue discs? They ain't the brakes — at least not in the traditional sense. The Lightning GT uses four hub-mounted electric motors, providing direct drive to the wheels. Combined with just 30 battery packs, these deliver the electric equivalent of "700 horsepower+" and each motor can be individually controlled.
This means the car can modify the speed of the wheels depending on steering angle and velocity, and presumably any other parameter the team can program into the system — suspension load, for example. This should lead to exceptionally dynamic handling — assuming all the computers are talking to each other.
Zero to 60 mph will, apparently, take less than four seconds — "when it's fully developed." This leads us to the more eyebrow-raising areas of the Lightning’s specifications. Having just 30 batteries is surprising enough (most electric supercars use far more than that), but the claim is these give the car a 300-km [186-mile] range — on just a 10-minute charge.
This is, quite frankly, unbelievable. That's not to say the Lightning Car Company hasn't achieved it — it does have video footage of the car moving under its own power displayed on the stand at the British Motor Show 2008 — but we would really like to see a full demonstration before even thinking about handing over any money.
Lightning officials say deliveries could start in 2010, but the company still requires investment to make that happen. It also claims "£20,000+ [US$40,000+] savings on annual running costs versus equivalent petrol sports car" — very bold. But if your biggest concern is the lack of an exciting engine note, fear not: the Lightning GT includes a “sound module.”
You can blast out the sound of a smooth V6 or throaty V12, or cruise along in serenity of silence. Make of that what you will. We love the concept of the Lightning GT — the look, the idea, the innovation, the British engineering. But my goodness, we need some convincing that the thing is really going to work.
Posted by MacDaddy at 10:35 AM 0 comments